Published review

Reclaimed-steel decision framework.

Separate screening, admissibility and approval under uncertainty.

Supplied known-input/predicted-response and target-role/measured-state decision graphic. Proposed reuse workflow, not a deployed industrial system. Publication · 10.3390/met16020171

Role: Research co-author
Period: 2026
Methods: Evidence framework · Uncertainty
Status: Published review

Decision supported

Distinguish reusable-steel candidates from members needing further evidence or checks.

Engineering record

Scope, method and evidence.

Publisher confirms Sina Sarfarazi, Marcello Fulgione and Francesco Fabbrocino. This is a conceptual decision framework; an implemented, validated reuse platform is not established.

01Engineering question

Separate screening, admissibility and approval under uncertainty.

Context: Structural steel reuse.

02Role and documented scope

Research co-author

03Methods and evidence

The published framework distinguishes candidate screening, mechanical admissibility, evidence requests and approval. Uncertainty and explainability support an auditable decision process. The diagram is a conceptual workflow, with no implemented steel-reuse platform or certified approval implied.

Supplied research files support the scope shown. Authorship is distinguished from personal ownership of every dataset, test or model; an interface is not proof of current deployment.

Publication record · 10.3390/met16020171

04Interpretation and limitations

No universal accuracy, engineering approval or field benefit is inferred from a selected output. Model domains and independent checks must be established for a new assignment.

Research supporting this project